Monthly Archives: October 2017

The 81st meeting of the Canadian Heritage Committee was dedicated to the M-103 study of systemic racism and religious discrimination in Canada.. It was held on 30 October , 2017 and its proceedings are summarized here.

 

Shahen Mirakian, President (by videoconference: Toronto, Ontario), Armenian National Committee of Canada, began the testimonies by stressing the importance of advocacy groups in advancing the cause of combating racism and discrimination. By way of example, he cited the Armenian earthquake of 1998 and how the Armenian National Committee of Canada sprung into action to collect desperately needed supplies and financial support. It did so by coordinating support from government, commercial and private citizen inputs and set a disaster relief framework in place that is in use today. He noted that other advocacy and faith groups had pioneered such strategies in the past with their communities of concern and have all had positive impacts on both the communities served and Canada. In a similar fashion, these advocacy groups are in a position to help with the fight against racism and discrimination as they are aware of policies, rules and regulations that contribute to both. He recommended that Members of Parliament be used as an advocacy group asset by acting as touchstones that coordinate and bring these groups together. He also recommended that some funding currently directed to aiding inter-cultural dialogue be re-directed to build up the capacity of smaller advocacy groups so that they are better able to enter into meaningful dialogue.

Robert Kuhn, President, Trinity Western University stated that Trinity Western University was the largest faith-based university in the country with more than 4000 students. He noted that the university has maintained an A+ quality status for seven years running and 65% of its students are involved in community service and outreach programs. He suggested that the Committee might be surprised that such a successful organization would be subjected to discrimination and exclusion by virtue of the Christian values that reside at its core. He went on to discuss examples of such religious discrimination including the decision of multiple law societies to restrict its graduates from serving within their jurisdictions. This, in direct opposition to Supreme Court decisions (2001) that demand that no religious viewpoint be the source of restricting an individual’s ability to participate fully in society. He recommended that the government take on a “duty to consult” religious communities before it creates anti racism and discrimination policies and that such policies should incorporate “accommodation” as a prime outcome. Lastly, he recommended the creation of an ombudsman position to mediate between the government and faith-based communities. In closing, he said that Trinity Western is an example of religious and systemic discrimination in Canada. The situation is getting worse and it shouldn’t be. This is not the open and inclusive Canada that used to be.

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, stated that the unintended consequences of M-103 need to be considered. Concentrating on “Islamophobia”, for example, is a move in the wrong direction and will result in more, not less, divisiveness. The Muslim community should not be coddled but, rather, treated as is every other community on the national landscape – this approach best ensures harmony. His organization believes in the separation of mosque and state and that the best way to defeat radical Islamism is to defeat the ideology that thrives within Islamic regimes. In these regimes and like-minded organizations, including those allied to the author of M-103, Islamophobia is used as a weapon to restrict free speech. He felt that the prime victim in using Islamophobia as an evil to be defeated would be Muslims themselves as they would be afraid to pursue the reforms that Islam is in need of. He went on to state that the founding premises of M-103, as established in petition E-411, actually smack of the language and logic posited by the Islamic theocracies that are currently creating so much havoc in the world. He recommended that western governments stop the “Countering Violent Extremism” strategy and replace it with one that “counters Violent Islamism”. Along these same lines, he suggested the government needs to stop taking the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and Muslim Brotherhood groups as allies and begin communicating with, and empowering, reform groups that seek to break Islam from the fossilized grasp of jihadism and salafism. Mr. Jasser was questioned aggressively by MP Virani who noted that Mr. Jasser mentioned Raheel Raza as an ally and that she was affiliated with the “Rebel” media. He left Mr. Jasser with no time to answer. MP Anderson upbraided MP Virani on his treatment of the witness and Mr. Jasser concluded by observing that MP Virani was, in effect, discriminating against him on the basis of association.

Muainudin Ahmed, Director, Muslim Food Bank and Community Services Society, noted that his organization interfaced daily with religious minorities and was well aware of the discrimination they face – particularly Muslim women wearing the hijab. The number one recommendation that he thought would make a difference in countering such discrimination was the re-direction of government funds to community organizations.

Azim Dahya, Chief Executive Officer, Muslim Food Bank and Community Services Society, was available for questioning but did not testify.

Balpreet Singh, Legal Counsel (by videoconference: Mississauga, Ontario), World Sikh Organization of Canada, stated that his organization supported M-103 and the notion that Islamophobia was discriminatory and needed to be countered. He noted that those in the Sikh community were the object of discrimination on a regular basis. He believed that secularism was required to ensure no one religion would be placed above all others but he also noted that all religions need equal space in the public square. He believed statistics and data would be important in identifying the scope of the problem and what needed to be done.

Video here: http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/XRender/en/PowerBrowser/PowerBrowserV2/20171030/-1/28203?Language=English&Stream=Video&useragent=Mozilla/5.0%20(iPad;%20CPU%20OS%209_3_5%20like%20Mac%20OS%20X)%20AppleWebKit/601.1.46%20(KHTML,%20like%20Gecko)%20Version/9.0%20Mobile/13G36%20Safari/601.1#info_

Why Moslems Cannot Assimilate Into Canada, America, Europe and Western Countries

Voltaire on Islam:

“The Quran teaches fear, hatred, contempt for others, murder as a legitimate means for the dissemination and preservation of this satanic doctrine. It talks ill of women, classifies people into classes, calls for blood and ever more blood. Yet, that Muhammad, a camel trader, sparks uproar in his tribe, that he wants to make his fellow citizens believe that he talked to the archangel Gabriel; that he boasted about being taken up into heaven and receiving a part of that indigestible book there, which can shake common sense on every page, that to gain respect for this work, he covers his country with fire and iron, that he strangles fathers, drags away daughters, that he leaves the beaten a free choice between death and his faith; now this is certainly something that no one can excuse, unless he came as a Turk into the world, unless superstition has stifled any natural light of reason in him.” Voltaire 1694-1788

With worldwide Moslem terror events becoming regular front-page news, leaders of Western countries might ask themselves why they promote Moslem immigration.

Where Islam gains a foothold in any host country, conflict ensues at the local level until it boils over onto the national stage.  While Moslems lay low in the beginning stages of their “hijrah” (‘seeding’ as advocated by the Quran to spread Islam) of host countries, as their numbers grow, they push for Sharia Law.

Already in the United Kingdom after 25 years of intense Moslem immigration, Islam features 3,000 mosques, 130 Sharia courts, 50 Muslim Sharia Councils and dozens of ‘no go zones’ where Moslem ‘Sharia’ patrols ensure no one disobeys Sharia Law.

Main rules of Sharia Law:  Islamic law opposes free speech, women’s rights and religious choice.  It advocates honor killings, female genital mutilation, four wives per husband, women as property of men, arranged marriages, wife beating, decapitation, and Islam supreme over all other religions.

Unfortunately, Islamic law diametrically contradicts Constitutional-democratic-republican law in every way.

Today in Canada, America and Europe—Moslems dictate the rules with millions of followers creating parallel societies inside of Western countries.  Once they arrive, no one understands why they fail to leave their barbaric rituals and become modernized.

I spoke with fellow research journalist Peter Goodchild on his understanding of Moslems in Western countries.  Could you give us an idea as to how and why Moslems cannot and do not assimilate into Western countries?

“The Muslim world-view differs greatly from that of the Westerner,” said Goodchild.  “Largely because Muslims are tribalist. There are many forms of Islamic culture, and tribalism is very much an Arabic characteristic, but it is common throughout the Muslim world. Muslim tribalism is also similar to that of native people in the Americas, or in Africa. Allegiance is to the tribe, not to a “country.” Arabic countries did not even exist until such political entities were forced upon them in the 20th century by the British and the Americans. The essence of tribalism is that a man’s (and secondarily a woman’s) loyalty is to the tribe. (Even in my Omani classrooms in 2008-11, if there was a student in a class who was not in the same tribe as the other students, then there could be trouble.) Muslims have two names, just as Westerners do, but the big difference is that a Westerner’s last name is a family name, whereas a Muslim’s last name is that of a tribe.

“Because a Muslim belongs to a tribe, he is raised from birth to regard people outside his own tribe as enemies. Because other people are enemies, it is senseless to speak of a “crime” against them. For example, killing someone from another tribe is not “murder.” “Lawrence of Arabia” fell into this problem when he was trying to unite the Arabs and get them to side with the British against the Turks in WWI.

“The issue of tribalism came up — with apparently little awareness on the part of Westerners — in the last few years, when large numbers of Muslim migrants poured into Europe. Westerners were appalled by the “crimes” being committed. But from a Muslim perspective these were not crimes at all. And from a Muslim perspective, Westerners are basically subhuman because they have no tribes. Because they have no tribes it is senseless to say that a Muslim is committing a “crime” against such people.

“Again as in the Americas or in Africa, a member of a tribal society regards his women as his property. The more women the better! To a tribalist, a law enforcing monogamy is senseless. Why should a man be deprived of a chance to increase his women or his donkeys or camels? And why should a man have to accord a woman the same rights as a man?

“One can go beyond the above, and consider religion. Muslims commonly say that Allah appeared first to Moses, secondly to Jesus, and thirdly to Muhammad. Westerners understand only the first two stages and are therefore doomed by Allah. A Muslim feels no compassion for a Westerner, since the latter has not only no tribe, but no real religion.

“What people such as Justin Trudeau, [Merkel, Macron, Trump, Theresa May, et al.] are doing is getting themselves elected as overlords of the Muslim tribes. The political unit is geographically somewhat larger than the Muslims are used to, but the concept of the Westerner as a subhuman pre-tribal enemy is already well in place.

“Westerners often use simple emotion-laden language, based almost entirely on Western assumptions about morality, to criticize Muslims for their “crimes,” or to criticize people such as Trudeau or [Trump] for helping Muslims. But to do so is to display the Westerner’s misunderstanding of the Muslim world-view. We can be appalled at tribal mentality, but it goes back thousands of years and should not be dismissed as merely some unfortunate aberration. In any case, without an understanding of that world-view, any moral objections are certainly simplistic — and somewhat misplaced. To deal with Islam one must first understand it.

“The above comments about Muslim tribalism are relevant to patterns of immigration in Canada, [America and Europe], but they are especially relevant to what can be called psychological warfare, “PSYOP” — warfare carried out by psychological devices rather than conventional weapons. Such warfare is often used by governments against their own citizens. Trudeau and his colleagues are experts at psychological warfare.

“Canadian leader Justin Trudeau is using Muslims, people who do not understand Western values, and would have no interest in such values even if they did understand them, as a means of asserting control over his own compatriots, Canadians — Westerners. In that sense, Trudeau is betraying his country.”

“Immigrants devoted to their own cultures and religions are not influenced by the secular politically correct façade that dominates academia, news-media, entertainment, education, religious and political thinking today,” said James Walsh, former Associate General Counsel of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. “They claim the right not to assimilate, and the day is coming when the question will be how can the United States regulate the defiantly unassimilated cultures, religions and mores of foreign lands?  Such immigrants say their traditions trump the U.S. legal system.  Balkanization of the United States has begun.”  Speech given by James Walsh in 1991

In America, Congress and our presidents betray the USA with continued Moslem immigration.  It’s a matter of time and numbers.

By Frosty Wooldridge

 

Please help us stop the advancement of Sharia  in Canada. Oppose Motion M-103 by contacting your MP and the Heritage Committee.

 Motion M-103

Eastern Demands Opposing Western Values

We must ‘unite’ and oppose M-103

**Please write to your MP advising that you will not vote for them in future elections if they are in favour of this motion and express your objections to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage and also Prime Minister Trudeau**

 Click here to contact your local MP

 Email addresses of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage:

 hedy.fry@parl.gc.ca; peter.vanloan@parl.gc.ca; Pierre.Nantel@parl.gc.ca; Pierre.Breton@parl.gc.ca; Sean.Casey@parl.gc.ca; Julie.Dabrusin@parl.gc.ca; Anju.Dhillon@parl.gc.ca; Julie.Dzerowicz@parl.gc.ca; Robert.Kitchen@parl.gc.ca; Stephane.Lauzon@parl.gc.ca; Martin.Shields@parl.gc.ca; Dan.Vandal@parl.gc.ca; Arif.Virani@parl.gc.ca; david.anderson@parl.gc.ca; scott.reid@parl.gc.ca; Garnett.Genuis@parl.gc.ca

And the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau at justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca

FACTS

**Our Constitution already covers all forms of discrimination.**

Motion M-103 is a private members motion put forth by Muslim MP Iqra Khalid who has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. The purpose of her motion, in her words, is to “condemn Islamophobia”. This is a word that remains ‘undefined’. Iqra Khalid accuses Canadians of ‘systemic racism’. However, despite her claims that the motion is inclusive of ‘all’ religions, she has intentionally and exclusively specified condemnation against only “Islam”.

*To NOTE* The Jewish community is the most discriminated against in Canada.**

We must oppose Motion M-103 as it will remove our freedom of speech and is specifically intended to advance Islam in Canada. It is currently before the committee for review and it is vital that we let them know, as well as the MP’s, that we object.

What does this mean for Canadians if this motion is passed?

It prohibits any criticism of “Islam” and “Islamic Ideology” currently being practised, and demanded, in Canada. It will eradicate our “FREEDOM of SPEECH” to voice our objections or concerns toward Muslims’

  • oppression of women
  • Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)
  • Honour killings
  • wearing a burqa or niqab when becoming a Canadian citizen or taking an oath
  • prohibiting criticism of Islam, Allah and Muhammad
  • Muslim demands for Islamic teaching, morning greetings, halal food and prayer in ‘public’ schools
  • polygamy, wife beating and segregated swimming pools.
  • Imams currently preaching hate toward Jews in ‘CANADIAN’ mosques.
  • Sharia Law…a totalitarian ideology..incompatible with Canadian law.

This is the beginning of what is referred to as a Stealth Jihad (attacking civilian and military targets of a particular country). The stealth jihadists move in and start influencing the society, government and other institutions for the purpose of implementing Sharia Law and an Islamic Caliphate (take over). It is currently, and effectively, being accomplished throughout Europe and the UK as Islamists refuse to integrate and assimilate and then self-victimize…as we are experiencing currently in Canada.

***Islamic ideology is incompatible with Western society and in fact ‘rejects’ Western values.

M-103 is the first step toward pushing Sharia Law in Canada…first a motion, then a bill and then law.

Despite Iqra’s vow “to oppose any motion or law that negatively impacts our multicultural society”…Ms. Khalid may not be in office long enough to ensure that this vow is honoured.  But is it possible that someone else may run with it to make it a bill and then law?

**Sharia Law – definition – “Islamic Law

 **Sharia Law – definition – “Islamic Law

Quote from the Quran: “fight unbelievers until they are either dead, converted to Islam, or in a permanent state of subjugation under Muslim domination. Allowing people of other faiths to live and worship independently of Islamic rule is ‘not’ an option”.(Quran 8:38-39; 9:5, 11, 29)

——————————————————————————————————–

Supporting Links and Information:

About Motion M-103, Iqra Khalid, and the Muslim extremist organizations bent on pushing this motion through in Canada:

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/12/what-is-really-behind-canadas-anti-islamophobia-motions

The push for Sharia in Canada:

http://www.torontosun.com/2017/09/25/stop-normalizing-sharia-law-in-canada

“Back in 2003, the Islamic Institute of Civil Justice proposed that Muslims have their own tribunals and a parallel legal system – Sharia law – in Ontario”.

“Sharia law replaces Canadian law, it doesn’t live alongside it”

Deborah Weiss the reason to stand against M-103 https://vimeo.com/237042088

Beheadings taught to children in Canadian mosque

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WL-E-Q2L9MM

Examples of Canadian Imams calling for death of Jews:

http://www.torontosun.com/2017/07/17/imam-charged-with-hate-promotion-against-jews

http://nationalpost.com/news/world/montreal-mosque-facing-calls-for-investigation-as-video-shows-imam-preaching-anti-semitic-conspiracy-theories

http://www.cjnews.com/news/canada/mosque-says-call-jews-deaths-response-gaza-massacre

Segregation of boys and girls at ‘public pools’. Father unable to view his daughter’s swim class.

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/04/06/toronto-dad-upset-hes-not-allowed-to-watch-daughters-swim-class

FGM is being performed in Canada as per passages from the Da’aim al-Islamt

http://www.metronews.ca/news/canada/2017/08/21/women-in-ismaili-muslim-sect-say-they-have-had-fgm-in-canada.html

Demand for Muslim prayer in schools/Muslim students removed from music classes

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/25/world/canada/a-battle-over-prayer-in-schools-tests-canadas-multiculturalism.html

Toronto Sun – news on Iqra Khalid:

http://www.torontosun.com/2017/09/19/are-mps-getting-the-wool-pulled-over-their-eyes-regarding-m-103

Confirms Iqra Khalid’s involvement with the MSA(Muslim Student Association) and debunks her own claims of personal discrimination.

“While Islamists complain of Islamophobia, Muslims mock Christians and Jews when we read the opening verse of the Qur’an (Sura Fatiha) during our daily prayers”.

Multiculturalism is Splintering the West.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11118/multiculturalism-separation-secession

“The Toronto District School Board (TDSB) issued a guidebook for ‘Islamic Heritage Month’ that includes a definition of ‘Islamophobia.’ As pointed out by B’nai Brith Canada, the definition was disturbingly broad, including defining ‘Islamphobia’ as ‘fear, prejudice, hatred or dislike directed against Islam or Muslims, or towards Islamic politics or culture.’” While the TDSB backed down when people got angry about their dangerous definition, they only did so when they got caught. They were obviously trying to sneak that ‘Islamic politics’ line through so they could suppress speech later on – exactly as M-103 supporters are working to do.

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/10/toronto-district-school-boards-dangerous-islamophobia-definition-shows-why-canadians-oppose-m-103

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

~ Edmund Burke ~

Muslim Tribalism from Muhammad to Trudeau

 

The Muslim world-view differs greatly from that of the Westerner, largely because Muslims are tribalist. There are, of course, many forms of Islamic culture, and tribalism is very much an Arabic characteristic, but it is common throughout the Muslim world. Muslim tribalism is also similar to that of native people in the Americas, or in Africa. Allegiance is to the tribe, not to a “country.” Arabic countries did not even exist until such political entities were forced upon them in the 20th century by the British and the Americans. The essence of tribalism is that a man’s (and secondarily a woman’s) loyalty is to the tribe. (Even in my Omani classrooms in 2008-11, if there was a student in a class who was not in the same tribe as the other students, then there could be trouble.) Muslims have two names, just as Westerners do, but the big difference is that a Westerner’s last name is a family name, whereas a Muslim’s last name is that of a tribe.

Because a Muslim belongs to a tribe, he is raised from birth to regard people outside his own tribe as enemies. Because other people are enemies, it is senseless to speak of a “crime” against them. For example, killing someone from another tribe is not “murder.” “Lawrence of Arabia” fell into this problem when he was trying to unite the Arabs and get them to side with the British against the Turks in WWI.

The issue of tribalism came up — with apparently little awareness on the part of Westerners — in the last few years, when large numbers of Muslim migrants poured into Europe. Westerners were appalled by the “crimes” being committed. But, as I said, from a Muslim perspective these were not crimes at all. And from a Muslim perspective, Westerners are basically subhuman because they have no tribes. Because they have no tribes it is senseless to say that a Muslim is committing a “crime” against such people.

Again as in the Americas or in Africa, a member of a tribal society regards his women as his property. The more women the better. To a tribalist, a law enforcing monogamy is senseless. Why should a man be deprived of a chance to increase his women or his donkeys or camels? And why should a man have to accord a woman the same rights as a man?

One can go beyond the above, and consider religion. Muslims commonly say that Allah appeared first to Moses, secondly to Jesus, and thirdly to Muhammad. Westerners understand only the first two stages and are therefore doomed by Allah. A Muslim feels no compassion for a Westerner, since the latter has not only no tribe, but no real religion.

What people such as Justin Trudeau are doing is getting themselves elected as overlords of the Muslim tribes. The political unit is geographically somewhat larger than the Muslims are used to, but the concept of the Westerner as a subhuman pre-tribal enemy is already well in place.

Westerners often use simple emotion-laden language, based almost entirely on Western assumptions about morality, to criticize Muslims for their “crimes,” or to criticize people such as Trudeau for helping Muslims. But to do so is to display the Westerner’s misunderstanding of the Muslim world-view. We can be appalled at tribal mentality, but it goes back thousands of years and should not be dismissed as merely some unfortunate aberration. In any case, without an understanding of that world-view, any moral objections are certainly simplistic — and somewhat misplaced. To deal with Islam one must first understand it.

The above comments about Muslim tribalism are relevant to patterns of immigration in Canada, but they are especially relevant to what can be called psychological warfare, “PSYOP” — warfare carried out by psychological devices rather than conventional weapons. Such warfare is often used by governments against their own citizens. Trudeau and his colleagues are experts at psychological warfare.

Justin Trudeau is using Muslims, people who do not understand Western values and would have no interest in such values even if they did understand them, as a means of asserting control over his own compatriots, Canadians — Westerners. In that sense, Trudeau is betraying his country.

Peter Goodchild