In Nigeria, the percentage of educated Muslims who are not willing to reject the imposition of sharia is 52%. In Turkey 5% favor the imposition of Sharia. In Indonesia, it is 77%, and in Lebanon it is 54%. Over in Senegal, the number is 78%.
With such high percentages of educated Muslims apparently favoring sharia law in their home countries, it is exceedingly unlikely that the West would be taking in (i.e., selecting exclusively for) only the Muslims who oppose a Quranic legal system. And if these individuals favor sharia law in their home countries, there is no reason why they wouldn’t favor sharia law in their adopted nation. In fact, the spread of sharia on the road toward the global caliphate may be exactly why they are emigrating.
Western Europe’s willkommenskultur and multiculturalism have been eroding European societies and disintegrating European value systems that were built over thousands of years. East-Central Europe has chosen a different path. Partly because of their steadfast nationalist pride and partly because of their newly acquired freedoms, the people of East-Central Europe will go the extra mile to preserve the freedoms and security they fought for. They don’t want to be Brusselized or live in the shadow of another superimposed guardian society. As a result of these factors, there will be a major migration wave from West to East, while concurrently, migrants will continue to pile up on the western half of the continent in order to collect higher social benefits and seek higher paying jobs
Repeatedly plugging his book, Terrified: How Anti-Muslim Fringe Organizations Became Mainstream, Christopher Bail argued that the “mainstreaming of anti-Muslim sentiment” in America is due not to terrorism, ISIS, or the attacks of September 11, 2001, but to:
… [a] very well-coordinated effort by a small network of anti-Muslim organizations who have succeeded not only in captivating the mass media but also, increasingly, in influencing our counter-terrorism policy and … American public opinion about Islam.
One often hears about the “moderate Muslim majority.” ‘After any terrorist attack, politicians tell us that, “The moderate majority of Muslims utterly condemn this.” After any outrage, commentators and pundits spring up to say, “Of course the vast majority of Muslims are moderate.” But is it true? Are the vast majority of Muslims really “moderate”? A number of factors suggest perhaps not — most obviously the problem repeatedly revealed by opinion polls. Time and again, the results of opinion polls in the Western world, never mind in the Middle East or North Africa, show a quite different picture from the “moderate majority” aquatint.
Bill Maher is a self-declared liberal who has the courage and sense to condemn Islam’s brutality against women. And Mr. Maher gets the same response from liberals that I get. He is called a bigot. But, look at what Islam does to liberal principles. I used Wikipedia to get this list:
Freedom of speech: Sharia does not allow anybody to say anything negative about Mohammed and Allah.
Freedom of press: Mohammed cartoons.
Freedom of religion: An apostate from Islam can be killed. Even an atheist wants people to be free to choose what they believe.
Civil rights: all non-Muslims are Kafirs, who are third class subjects under Sharia law.
Democratic society: A Kafir does not have the same rights as a Muslim under Islam.
Secular governments: Secular is not Sharia. Islamic government is a theocracy.
Why do liberals and progressives defend an Islam that will destroy all they find so valuable?
One thing that many Americans find hard to understand is what it is like to live under a dictatorship. Why would they know? After all, America has always been a democracy, since its inception. They have no experience of living in a dictatorship. The naivety of Barack Obama over Iran is driven by breathtaking gullibility. Fabricated opinion polls about the views of ordinary Iranians are taken at face value. The end of this administration can’t come soon enough.
I go on at some length about the quantum imbroglio because it furnishes an excellent example of Trudeau’s glitzy superficiality. A skin-deep performer, he is good at looking the look and talking the talk, but at precious little else. Trudeau’s manifold “accomplishments” surely have nothing to do with the intelligence and wisdom needed to govern a G7 nation. Mastering yoga poses, exhibiting snowboarding techniques, horsing around in a boxing ring, stripping for a ladies’ charity function, or whiffling (in his case, glibly and without comprehension) on quantum computing are completely unrelated to an understanding of the thorny political and economic issues that go with responsible leadership in the turmoil of national and international affairs—apart from the fact that the dignity of statesmanship has gone by the board.
Robert Spencer on “Islamophobia”
Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer explains the “Islamophobia” scam.
Robert Spencer: Is Islam a Religion of Peace?