Monthly Archives: February 2016

Odd Man Out: The Singular Political Stylings Of Justin Trudeau

Justin Trudeau is a man of the people. This in itself, cannot be questioned. What can be questioned, however, is whether or not our current Prime Minister is a man of the Canadian people.

Barely four months into a four-year term, Justin Trudeau has quickly established himself as the most atypical prime minister in Canadian history. Only Justin’s father, former Liberal Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, comes close— although Trudeau Sr. was subtle enough to hide his lack of respect for general public opinion.

Justin Trudeau, however, has all the subtlety of a sand blaster. Oblivious to the desires of the general public—at least the ones born and raised upon Canadian soil— Trudeau the younger is brazen in his quest to redefine our society based upon little more than subjective feelings and personal moral standards.

Whether playing global ambassador to U.N. leader Ban-Ki Moon, international playboy to Melinda Gates, or speaker du-jour at Revival Of The Islamic Spirit conferences, Justin Trudeau is all about the other. Unfortunately for 35 million Canadians, they are not part of the “other”— they are part of Canada—the entity our pin-up Prime Minister appeared to care about previous to winning the last federal election.

Since that time, Justin and his Liberals have broken just about every major campaign promise made while running for office. Deficit projections, marijuana legislation, refugee quotas— you name it and the Liberals have broken it.

It is difficult to pinpoint exactly what is on Justin’s mind at any given time. In fact, the only thing we can be sure of is what is not on his mind—namely, millions of “generational” Canadian-born citizens, who just happen to comprise the largest demographic segment within our nation. Even more curious is his complete disregard for our English and French Canadian heritage Thus far, Justin has yet to publicly reference or acknowledge the two founding peoples of our country. Perhaps he believes that if he ignores them long enough, they will go away.

This politically unprecedented dynamic is worth exploring. After all, who ever heard of a leader of a country who does not, at least from time to time, make positive reference to the history and heritage of his nation?

Not our Justin. He has no time for such trivialities. Indeed, Justin Trudeau is all about the global— and he has the spending habits prove it. An analysis of his first 100 days in office reveal that within this time period the Liberal government handed out $527 million dollars to Canadian interests, and a whopping $4.8 billion to foreign interests.

This brings forth several key questions— who exactly is Justin Trudeau working for?  Why is he giving away billions of our tax dollars to foreign nations, particularly of the non-democratic variety? Without doubt, most Canadians would agree that spending even a portion of these billions on domestic issues such as homelessness and child poverty is preferable to handing the money to foreign governments.

Has Justin heard of a recent report stating that 2250 homeless military veterans are currently walking our cold Canadian streets? Perhaps this tidbit was overlooked  at the last Liberal Caucus meeting— the agenda being full up with top priority items such as free food, shelter, education and medical care to non-Canadian victims of the Syrian refugee crisis.

Considered from an historical perspective, one wonders what our political leaders of the past might have had to say about Justin’s unique style of decision-making. What, for example, would former Liberal prime minister and occultist MacKenzie King think about Trudeau’s international indulgences? In keeping with King’s interest in the world beyond, perhaps Canadians should pull out their collective ouija boards and try to find out. How about salt-of-the-earth Presbyterian PM John Diefenbaker?  Granted, we live in very different times, however does this validate Justin’s fervent dedication to all-things-global and a corresponding antipathy toward all that is traditionally Canadian? How about that grand old man of medicare,  former Saskatchewan Premier Tommy Douglas? Yes, he may have founded universal medicare, but would he be on board with young Trudeau’s agenda to universalize our entire nation?

It is doubtful that any mature statesman, past or present, would admire the singular political stylings of Justin Trudeau. His political world is an anomaly- unique in all of Canadian history, and he has only been doing the job for four months.

On the day of October 19th, 2015, 6.9 million Canadians voted for the Liberal party, while 5.6 million voted for the Conservatives.  Yet, considering the brand of leadership thus far employed, it is easy to conclude that neither block of voters matter one iota to Justin Trudeau.

Within any western country other than one saturated with political correctness, this simply would not stand. In a healthy democratic nation, Justin Trudeau’s foreign lottery give-away program would be considered a colossal misappropriation of tax-payer funds. Yet, due to a comprehensive, decades-long program of enforced diversity, Canadians have developed an inability to see the national forest through the multicultural trees.

Yes, Justin Trudeau is a man of the people— as long as the people are  globalist billionaires, non-western diplomats and foreign politicians. For the rest of us, however— namely, 35 million Canadian citizens—we are once again second-class citizens to a first-class political opportunist by the name of Trudeau.

writer: brad salzberg, february 2016


Take a Gander at This Amazing, Yet Little Known, 9-11 Story. How Canada Reacted

In spite of all the rotten things we see going on in today’s world this story confirms that there are still a lot of good people in the world and when things get bad, they will come forward.

Speech Given by Valerie Price Representing ACT! For Canada at the Pentagon Commerating 9/11

On September 11, 2001, Americans and all peace-loving citizens of the world were introduced to sudden and unprecedented violence.

Although the full horror of that morning would take weeks to materialize – across the continent events unfolded in a matter of hours that would forever change the meaning of “neighbour” above and below the 49th Parallel.

Over 200 planes were diverted to Canada and thousands of passengers and crew became the “guests” of tiny hamlets in Newfoundland and Labrador, and several cities throughout Canada. Frightened and weary travellers found a “safe harbour” far away from home.

Canada and the United States were connected through grief and generosity with values and commitments. We were brought together by tragedy, bound by friendship and compassion. It was – and is – a friendship of profound depth; a friendship between two great nations – Canada and the United States – and it renewed and reaffirmed the crucible of the worst terrorist attack in history.

Canadians responded because the attack was an offence against the values of freedom, tolerance and respect for cultural diversity that are the cornerstones of our nations. We responded because we intuitively understood that this was an assault not just on the United States, but against all civilized peoples and nations.  Those who attacked the United States attacked our sacred and deepest ideals, the very essence of who we are.  But above all, we responded out of common human decency.

In 1961, John Kennedy said:

“Geography has made us neighbours. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies.”

Today, we remember with reverence the 26 Canadians who were amongst the 2,996 precious lives lost on this day 13 years ago. Canada and the United States must continue to be steadfast and unwavering in standing together to protect our shared values of freedom, democracy  and liberty against  those who wish to destroy us.

God bless Canada and God bless the United States of America

Washington, September 11, 2014

70,000 March in Poland against Immigration

Described as the ‘largest demonstration in Polish history’, around 70,000 Polish nationalists took to the streets yesterday in the city center of Warsaw against immigration into Europe and the European Union—and in particular the latter’s demands that Poland “absorb” invaders who have flooded into Germany over the past few months. Protesters referred to the immigrants as invaders.

The large crowd repeatedly chanted “Poland for the Polish” and “Yesterday Moscow, today Brussels, taking our freedom away.” Other slogans reported by the Polish media included “Let us hurry and finish off the communists …” and “Stop Islamisation.”

U.S. judge awards $134-million in suit against Omar Khadr

A U.S. judge has granted $134.2-million in damages to the widow of an American soldier killed in Afghanistan and another soldier partially blinded by a hand grenade in their lawsuit against former Guantanamo Bay prisoner Omar Khadr. In their lawsuit, Tabitha Speer and Layne Morris alleged a teenage Mr. Khadr was responsible for the death of Sergeant Christopher Speer and Mr. Morris’s injuries in Afghanistan in July 2002.

No More Boot-Licking

The latest news shows that most of the near 25,000 who have arrived here are far from “desperate”. In fact, most of them have been housed for years in housing in countries that neighbour Syria. The Canada Border Services Agency revealed this a few days ago.The Syrians had fled their country, but they were not getting bombed every day in their new residences. What our government has really done is merely transfer people who were safely housed in the Middle East to safe housing in Canada. But what are the consequences for Canada?

‘InterNational Socialist’ Leaders Leverage Islam Against Their Own Citizens

It is Western leaders who have loosed the Islamic horde upon their citizens while excoriating and imprisoning us for merely discussing the threat. As I have written previously, the instability that this generates is calculated to dramatically erode personal liberties and coalesce the power of the international socialist police state.

‘Anti-Racism’ Campaigner Gets Taste of His Own Medicine

Nick Lowles, the director of Hope Not Hate, claims to have been denied an invitation to speak at a conference on anti-racism on the grounds he is “Islamophobic.” Now that Lowles has attempted to oppose anti-Muslim bigotry, he seems to have found himself subjected to the same tactics that he has espoused. Hopefully, this latest turn of events will make him reconsider his previous stances and work with Muslim activists who oppose extremism, as we do, instead of trying to silence them.